Active vs. Passive Investing in Volatile Markets: The 2026 Reality Check Every Indian Investor Needs
With Nifty valuations running high and global uncertainty spiking, should you trust a fund manager or just buy the index? Here’s the honest, data-backed answer.
Picture your uncle — the one who confidently bought IT stocks in 2021 at peak valuations, “diversified” into crypto in 2022, and is now asking you which mid-cap NFO to apply for in 2026. Every family has one. And while we love him dearly, we probably don’t want to invest like him.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth: most of us, at some point, invest exactly like that uncle. We chase past returns. We panic during crashes. We hear a hot tip and act on it within 48 hours. And we pick funds based on which one has a prettier graph on Moneycontrol.
2026 is a particularly tricky year to be an Indian investor. Markets have run up significantly from their 2020 COVID lows. Valuations — measured by metrics like Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and Price-to-Book (P/B) — are elevated across large-caps and many mid-caps. Global interest rates remain uncertain. Elections, geopolitical tensions, and AI-driven disruption are reshaping sectors at lightning speed.
In this environment, one question refuses to go away: Should you trust an active fund manager to navigate this mess — or just buy the index and go watch cricket?
This article will answer that question thoroughly, honestly, and without the jargon that makes most financial articles read like a Terms and Conditions document.
📋 What We’ll Cover
- What are Active and Passive Funds? (The honest definitions)
- Indian Market Valuations in 2026: Where Do We Stand?
- How Volatility Changes the Game
- The Great Expense Ratio Robbery
- Alpha Generation — Can Active Managers Actually Beat the Market?
- The Closet Indexing Problem (Your “Active” Fund May Not Be That Active)
- Large-Cap vs. Mid-Cap vs. Small-Cap: Different Rules, Different Winners
- Passive Investing Risks in an Overheated Market
- Myth vs. Reality: What You’ve Been Told vs. What the Data Says
- Behavioral Finance: Why You Are Your Own Worst Enemy
- Portfolio Construction for 2026
- 2026 Investor Survival Guide
- FAQs
1. The Basics First: What Exactly Are We Comparing?
🔵 Active Mutual Funds
An active mutual fund employs a fund manager (and often an entire research team) whose job is to pick stocks, time sectors, and construct a portfolio that beats a benchmark index. Think of a Flexi-cap fund, a large-cap fund, or a thematic sector fund. The manager’s daily job is to analyze companies, meet management, study quarterly results, and decide what to buy, hold, or sell.
The implicit promise is: “We’re smarter than the average market participant. Give us your money and we’ll generate returns above the index.”
In exchange for this promise, you pay a higher fee — the Total Expense Ratio (TER). This is usually 0.50% to 1.50% per year on direct plans, and higher on regular plans.
🟢 Passive / Index Funds
A passive fund (index fund or ETF) makes no such promise. It simply says: “We’ll buy all the stocks in an index — like the Nifty 50, Sensex, or Nifty Next 50 — in the same proportion as they appear in the index.”
No stock picking. No market timing. No brilliant analyst. Just systematic, emotionless replication of the market. And because there’s very little work involved, the fees are dramatically lower — some Nifty 50 index funds charge as little as 0.05% to 0.10% per year.
The core philosophical bet of passive investing is this: markets are mostly efficient most of the time, and most active managers — after accounting for fees — cannot consistently outperform the index over long periods. The data from developed markets strongly supports this. In India, the picture is more nuanced.
2. Indian Market Valuations in 2026: Are We Expensive?
Let’s look at where we actually stand. No sugarcoating.
| Metric | Nifty 50 (2020 Low) | Nifty 50 (2024) | Nifty 50 (2026 Est.) | Historical Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 18–20x | 22–24x | 22–26x | 20–22x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.5–2.8x | 3.5–4.0x | 3.8–4.2x | 3.0–3.5x |
| Market Cap / GDP | ~70% | ~130% | ~120–135% | ~80–90% |
| Nifty Midcap 150 P/E | 22x | 35–40x | 32–42x | 26–30x |
The numbers tell a clear story: India is not cheap right now. Does that mean you should stop investing? Absolutely not. India’s structural growth story — urbanization, digitization, manufacturing push, rising middle class — remains compelling. But elevated valuations do mean that returns over the next 5–7 years are likely to be more modest than the last decade, and volatility could be sharper when corrections hit.
This is precisely the kind of environment where the active vs. passive debate gets very interesting.
Elevated valuations don’t tell you when the market will correct — only that future returns from current levels are statistically lower. Anyone who tells you they know exactly when a correction will happen is either lying or delusional (or both). Don’t try to time the market. Keep investing, but be thoughtful about portfolio construction.
3. How Volatility Changes the Investing Game
In calm, steadily rising markets, almost everyone looks like a genius. Your SIP in any reasonable fund gives you decent returns. Your cousin’s “smallcase portfolio” is up 40%. Even your colleague who picks stocks by “gut feeling” is showing off screenshots.
Volatility is the great humbler. When markets become choppy — swinging 3–5% in either direction within weeks — three things happen:
- Panic selling increases: Retail investors redeem during falls, locking in losses
- Stock selection matters more: Quality of individual holdings starts separating funds
- Cash management becomes an advantage: Active managers can hold cash; index funds cannot
Theoretically, this should be where active managers shine. And sometimes they do. But here’s the hard truth: the evidence that active managers consistently protect the downside better than index funds is weak, even in India.
The reason? During panic, most fund managers also sell — often too late or too early. Their behavioral biases are as real as yours and mine. The difference is they’re managing your money while experiencing those biases.
The market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient.
— Warren Buffett (and every SIP calculator ever)
4. The Great Expense Ratio Robbery: Why Costs Matter More Than You Think
This section might be the most important one in the entire article, and it’s the one most Indian investors completely ignore.
Let’s do some math. Assume you invest ₹10,000 per month via SIP for 25 years at a gross return of 12% per year.
| Fund Type | Gross Return | TER (Approx.) | Net Return | Final Corpus (25 Yrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nifty 50 Index Fund (Direct) | 12% | 0.10% | 11.90% | ₹1.89 Cr |
| Active Large-Cap Fund (Direct) | 12% | 0.80% | 11.20% | ₹1.73 Cr |
| Active Large-Cap Fund (Regular) | 12% | 1.50% | 10.50% | ₹1.59 Cr |
That’s a ₹30 lakh difference between a direct index fund and a regular active fund — even with the same gross return. And here’s the cruel irony: in large-cap funds, most active managers don’t even match the gross return of the index consistently after SEBI’s 2018 recategorization tightened their portfolio rules.
Always invest in Direct Plans, not Regular Plans. The difference in TER (usually 0.50%–1.00%) is pure commission going to your distributor. Over 20 years, this can cost you lakhs of rupees in lost compounding. Use platforms like MFCentral, Kuvera, Zerodha Coin, or Groww to invest in direct plans.
5. Alpha Generation: Can Active Managers Actually Beat the Market?
Alpha is the return that a fund manager generates above and beyond the benchmark index, after adjusting for risk. If the Nifty 50 returned 12% and your active large-cap fund returned 13.5%, the fund manager generated roughly 1.5% of alpha. Simple concept. Incredibly hard to do consistently.
The 5-Year Track Record Reality
The conclusion from the data is stark: in large-cap funds, most active managers fail to beat the index most of the time. In mid and small caps, there’s more room to generate alpha because these markets are less efficiently priced. But even here, picking the right fund manager is critical — and past performance, as every fund disclaimer tells you, doesn’t guarantee future results.
When we look at which active funds “beat the index,” we often forget the funds that were quietly merged or wound up because they performed poorly. This survivorship bias makes active fund performance data look better than it actually is in aggregate. The true picture is worse than the charts suggest.
6. The Closet Indexing Problem (The Dirty Secret of Active Funds)
Here’s a secret the mutual fund industry doesn’t advertise loudly: many so-called “active” large-cap funds are secretly behaving like index funds — but charging you active fund prices.
This is called Closet Indexing. The fund holds 40–50 stocks, with 70–80% of the portfolio in the same stocks as the Nifty 50, in similar weightings. The fund manager makes minor tweaks — slightly overweighting some stocks, underweighting others — but the portfolio is so similar to the index that the Active Share (a measure of how different the fund is from the index) is very low.
Why does this happen? Because fund managers are human. If they deviate significantly from the index and underperform, they risk losing their jobs. If they hug the index and underperform slightly, it’s easier to explain. The incentive structure pushes them toward safety — your safety? Not necessarily.
Your “active” large-cap fund might be closet indexing if: (1) It holds 40+ stocks with top 10 holdings identical to the Nifty 50, (2) Its 3-year return is within 0.5% of the Nifty 50 — but with a higher TER, (3) The portfolio barely changed during the last market crash. If this is you, you’re overpaying for an index fund. Switch.
7. The Market Cap Debate: Different Rules for Different Segments
The active vs. passive debate is NOT one-size-fits-all. The answer depends heavily on which market cap segment you’re investing in.
| Segment | Market Efficiency | Analyst Coverage | Active Fund Advantage | Verdict 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | High | Very high (50+ analysts/stock) | Low | Passive Preferred |
| Mid Cap | Moderate | Moderate (10–30 analysts) | Medium | Active (select managers) |
| Small Cap | Low | Low (2–10 analysts) | High | Active (high-conviction) |
| International | Very high | Extremely high | Very Low | Passive (ETFs/FOF) |
The logic here is about market efficiency. The Nifty 50 stocks — Reliance, TCS, HDFC Bank, Infosys — are covered by 50+ analysts globally. Every piece of public information is instantaneously priced in. It’s extremely hard for a fund manager to have an edge here. But in smaller companies, information is less available, research is sparse, and a skilled analyst who does deep fieldwork can absolutely find undervalued gems before the market does.
Nifty 50 vs. Actively Managed Large-Cap Funds: The Verdict
After SEBI’s 2018 categorization rules forced large-cap funds to invest at least 80% in the top 100 stocks by market cap, the flexibility that active managers once enjoyed was severely curtailed. Since then, the data has been unambiguous: a low-cost Nifty 50 or Sensex index fund beats the majority of actively managed large-cap funds on a rolling 5-year basis, especially after accounting for expense ratios.
Flexi-Cap Funds vs. Index Funds: A More Interesting Battle
Flexi-cap funds have more freedom — they can invest across large, mid, and small-cap companies without strict percentage constraints. This gives talented fund managers a genuine opportunity to add value. Funds like Parag Parikh Flexi Cap (with its international diversification) represent a genuinely differentiated active strategy. For active investing, flexi-cap and mid-cap categories are where your search should begin.
8. Hidden Risks of Passive Investing in Overheated Markets
Passive investing is not a magic bullet. Before you sell all your active funds and pile into index funds, here are some legitimate concerns to understand:
The Concentration Risk Problem
The Nifty 50 index is market-cap weighted. This means the biggest companies have the biggest weight. As of 2026, the top 10 stocks account for over 55% of the Nifty 50’s weight. If you buy the Nifty 50, you’re essentially heavily concentrated in a handful of companies. If those companies face headwinds (regulatory action, global competition, sectoral disruption), your “diversified” index fund takes a big hit.
The Passive Bubble Concern
As more money flows into index funds, it automatically buys more of the largest stocks, pushing their prices higher — regardless of their actual business performance. This can create a self-reinforcing cycle where index stocks become increasingly overvalued simply because of inflows, not fundamental merit. While this risk is still limited in India (passive AUM is a small fraction of total mutual fund AUM), it’s a growing concern globally.
No Downside Protection
If the Nifty 50 falls 30%, your index fund falls exactly 30%. A truly active manager, in theory, could have reduced equity exposure or shifted to defensive stocks and softened the blow. Whether most managers actually do this in practice is another matter — but passive investors have zero protection by design.
Use index funds as your core portfolio (60–70%) for large-cap exposure. Add satellite positions in select active funds — particularly good flexi-cap and mid-cap managers — to capture potential alpha where markets are less efficient. This “Core-Satellite” approach combines the best of both worlds.
9. Myth vs. Reality: What You’ve Been Told vs. What Data Shows
“Active fund managers always protect you during market crashes better than index funds.”
Most active managers also fall during crashes — often as much as the index. Research shows that during the 2020 COVID crash, very few active funds provided meaningful downside protection vs. Nifty 50.
“If a fund gave 25% returns last year, it will continue to do so.”
Return persistence in Indian mutual funds is notoriously weak. Top-performing funds in one 3-year period frequently underperform in the next. Chasing past performance is one of the most costly mistakes retail investors make.
“Index funds are for beginners who don’t know better. Serious investors use active funds.”
Some of the world’s most sophisticated institutional investors — pension funds, endowments — allocate heavily to passive strategies precisely because they understand how hard it is to outperform consistently. Passive is sophisticated, not simple.
“In a volatile market, you should stop your SIPs and wait for stability.”
Stopping SIPs during volatility is exactly backwards. Volatility means you’re buying units at lower prices, improving your average cost. Continuing SIPs during a crash is how long-term wealth is built. Every major correction in Indian market history was followed by a recovery.
10. Factor Investing & Smart Beta: The Middle Ground
There’s a fascinating middle ground between pure active and pure passive: Factor Investing, also called Smart Beta.
These are rule-based strategies that tilt toward specific characteristics — factors — that have been shown to generate better risk-adjusted returns over time:
- Value: Buying stocks that are cheap relative to their fundamentals (low P/E, P/B)
- Momentum: Buying stocks that have been rising and selling those that have been falling
- Quality: Buying stocks with strong balance sheets, high ROE, low debt
- Low Volatility: Buying stocks with historically lower price swings
- Size: Tilting toward smaller companies (who tend to outperform large-caps over long periods)
In 2026, several Indian AMCs offer factor-based index funds — Nifty Alpha 50, Nifty Quality 30, Nifty 200 Momentum 30, and more. These provide a systematic, low-cost way to seek outperformance without relying on a human fund manager’s discretion.
In a high-valuation environment, Quality and Low Volatility factors have historically shown better resilience. Companies with strong cash flows, low debt, and high return on equity tend to hold up better during corrections. A Nifty 100 Quality 30 or similar fund could be a smart addition to your passive portfolio in 2026’s market context.
11. Behavioral Finance: Why You Are Your Own Worst Enemy
Here’s something no fund fact sheet will tell you: the biggest risk to your wealth is not market volatility, not expensive valuations, and certainly not the fund manager’s portfolio choices. It’s you.
Behavioral finance has documented dozens of cognitive biases that cause investors to make systematically bad decisions. Here are the most dangerous ones for 2026:
🧠 The Big 5 Behavioral Traps
1. Recency Bias
We overweight recent events. After a 2-year bull market, we expect the bull to continue. After a 3-month correction, we expect the crash to deepen. Neither assumption is reliably true. The market doesn’t know or care what happened in the last few months.
2. Loss Aversion
Psychologically, losing ₹1,000 hurts approximately twice as much as gaining ₹1,000 feels good. This causes investors to sell during falls to “stop the pain” — precisely when they should be buying. Loss aversion is why most retail investors buy high and sell low, the exact opposite of what you should do.
3. Herd Mentality
When your entire WhatsApp group is investing in Small Cap Fund X and showing you their 50% returns, it takes enormous discipline to stick to your own allocation plan. Social proof is powerful. And in investing, what “everyone is doing” is usually a contrarian signal.
4. Overconfidence
After a year of good returns, many investors start believing they have figured out the market. They start taking bigger concentrated bets, reducing diversification, and ignoring risk. This is when the most wealth is destroyed — in the 3rd or 4th year of a bull market.
5. FOMO (Fear of Missing Out)
In 2021, everyone FOMO-ed into crypto and meme stocks. In 2023, everyone FOMO-ed into small-cap funds. In 2025, a new theme emerged. In 2026, there will be another one. FOMO is the enemy of a disciplined investment plan. It causes you to redeploy capital at peak valuations into whatever is hot right now.
Write an Investment Policy Statement — a simple document that states your goals, time horizon, asset allocation, and the conditions under which you will or will not make changes. Review it before any investment decision. This forces a pause between emotional impulse and financial action.
12. SIP Investing During Volatility: Your Unfair Advantage
Here’s the beautiful thing about SIPs that no one explains properly: volatility is not your enemy when you invest via SIPs. It’s actually your friend.
When markets fall, your fixed monthly SIP buys more units. When markets rise, those units are worth more. This is called Rupee Cost Averaging, and it mathematically lowers your average cost of purchase over time without you having to predict market timing.
The classic Indian SIP joke: “My SIP is red, should I pause it?” The correct answer, almost always, is no. Pausing your SIP during a correction is like canceling your grocery order because food prices fell — you’re voluntarily choosing to buy less when things are on sale.
SIP in Active vs. Passive During Volatile Markets
The SIP argument actually favors index funds more: because index funds never hold cash (they’re always fully invested), volatile periods automatically route more units to your portfolio. Active funds may hold 5–15% in cash/debt as a defensive measure, which can reduce the benefit of rupee cost averaging during crashes.
13. Common Mistakes Investors Make in High-Valuation Markets
- Stopping SIPs because “the market is too high” — but having no plan for when to restart
- Switching from long-term equity funds to debt/FDs in a panic, and missing the subsequent recovery
- Chasing NFOs (New Fund Offers) of thematic/sector funds at market peaks — typically launched when the theme is already overpriced
- Investing in Regular Plans instead of Direct Plans, silently losing 0.5–1% per year to commissions
- Over-diversifying into 15+ mutual funds that are all essentially holding the same stocks
- Ignoring tax efficiency — selling and re-buying unnecessarily, triggering LTCG/STCG
- Comparing your portfolio to the Nifty 50 when you hold a balanced hybrid fund — it’s not a fair benchmark
- Letting your asset allocation drift without annual rebalancing
14. 2026 Ideal Portfolio Construction: The Core-Satellite Framework
Given everything we’ve discussed — elevated valuations, volatility risks, the cost advantage of passive funds, but the alpha potential in mid and small caps — here’s a practical portfolio framework for different types of investors:
Simple & Safe
- 50% — Nifty 50 Index Fund
- 20% — Nifty Next 50 Index Fund
- 20% — Aggressive Hybrid Fund (Active)
- 10% — Liquid/Overnight Fund (Emergency)
Core-Satellite
- 35% — Nifty 50 Index Fund
- 15% — Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund
- 20% — Flexi Cap Active Fund (high Active Share)
- 20% — Mid Cap Active Fund (select manager)
- 10% — Gold/Silver ETF
Multi-Factor Portfolio
- 25% — Nifty 50 Index Fund
- 10% — Nifty Quality 30 / Momentum Factor Fund
- 15% — Flexi Cap Active (high conviction)
- 15% — Mid Cap Active (proven manager)
- 10% — Small Cap Active (focused/multi-cap)
- 10% — International Index Fund (US/Global)
- 10% — Arbitrage/Liquid Fund
- 5% — Gold ETF
These allocations are illustrative examples, not personalized advice. Your actual allocation should depend on your age, risk appetite, goals, existing portfolio, and financial obligations. Consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser for personalized guidance.
15. Active vs. Passive During Market Crashes: Who Wins?
This is the question that keeps every nervous investor up at night. Let’s look at historical Indian crash data:
| Crash Period | Nifty 50 Fall | Avg. Active Large-Cap Fall | Avg. Active Flexi-Cap Fall | Passive Edge? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID Crash (Feb–Mar 2020) | -38% | -39% | -36% | Marginal |
| 2018 IL&FS Crisis | -15% | -18% | -14% | Mixed |
| 2015–16 Global Selloff | -22% | -20% | -18% | Active Slight Edge |
| 2022 Rate Hike Correction | -14% | -13% | -11% | Active Marginal Edge |
The data is humbling for active fund proponents: during major crashes, most active large-cap funds fell as much as, or more than, the index. Flexi-cap and multi-cap funds did marginally better in some instances, benefiting from their ability to shift sector weights or increase cash. But the difference was rarely large enough to justify the higher ongoing expense ratio.
The recovery, however, tells an interesting story. Quality-focused active funds — those that held companies with strong balance sheets and low debt — tended to recover faster after the 2020 COVID crash than pure index funds, because the index includes companies of varying quality.
In a downturn, the market doesn’t punish you for buying the index. But it also doesn’t reward you for it. What matters most is whether you stay invested at all.
— The most important lesson from every market crash
16. The Social Media Effect: How Fintech Influencers Are Reshaping Investing Behavior
We need to talk about the elephant in the digital room. In 2026, a significant portion of young Indian investors get their investment “education” from Instagram reels, YouTube Shorts, and Twitter/X threads from financial influencers (finfluencers).
Some of this content is excellent — genuinely educational, data-backed, and balanced. But a disturbing amount of it is essentially entertainment dressed up as advice: “Top 5 Small Cap Stocks to Buy RIGHT NOW”, “This Index Fund Will Make You Crorepati!”, “Why I Moved 100% to Gold in 2026.”
The problem is that virality rewards extreme, confident, emotionally engaging content — not nuanced, “it depends” investment wisdom. The algorithms don’t care whether the advice will destroy your wealth. They care whether you watch for 45 seconds and share it.
Be deeply skeptical of any content that: (1) promises specific returns (“This fund will give 40% in 12 months”), (2) urges you to invest NOW without understanding your personal situation, (3) recommends highly concentrated or leveraged positions as “low risk,” (4) dismisses diversification as “for people who don’t know what they’re doing.” No legitimate financial professional makes these claims.
17. The 2026 Investor Survival Guide: 8 Principles to Navigate What’s Ahead
Never Abandon Your Asset Allocation in a Panic
Define your equity:debt:gold allocation in advance. Rebalance annually. Don’t let fear or greed move you away from your plan.
Use Index Funds for Large-Cap Core
In large caps, you’re almost certainly better off with a low-cost index fund than paying active fund fees for average returns.
Be Selective with Active in Mid & Small Cap
Choose active funds with high Active Share, consistent process, experienced manager, and a track record across market cycles — not just recent bull markets.
Always Use Direct Plans
This single switch — from Regular to Direct plan — can add lakhs of rupees to your final corpus over a 20-year horizon. There is no good reason to invest in Regular plans if you manage your own portfolio.
SIPs Don’t Need to Stop During Volatility
In fact, volatile markets are when SIPs shine brightest through rupee cost averaging. Keep them running unless your personal financial situation demands a pause.
Don’t Chase NFOs or Hot Themes
NFOs launched at market peaks in hot sectors (AI, EV, defence, whatever is trending) are usually designed to capture investor enthusiasm, not generate superior returns.
Consider Factor Funds for Smart Passive
Quality, Low Volatility, and Momentum factor funds offer a systematic, low-cost way to tilt your passive portfolio toward historically better-performing characteristics.
Review, Don’t React
Check your portfolio quarterly for rebalancing. Don’t check it daily. Daily portfolio checks lead to anxiety, impulsive decisions, and ultimately, worse outcomes.
People Also Ask: Frequently Asked Questions
In large-cap funds, index funds have consistently beaten most active funds after fees. In mid-cap and small-cap, skilled active managers can still generate meaningful alpha. The answer depends on the market cap segment and the specific fund manager you choose.
Yes — continuing SIPs in index funds during high-valuation periods remains prudent because timing the market is practically impossible. Elevated valuations are a reason to moderate expectations, not to stop investing. Consider balancing with a flexible active fund that can adjust equity allocation defensively if needed.
Active mutual funds typically charge 0.5%–1.5% TER for direct plans, and 1.0%–2.0% for regular plans. Passive index funds charge as low as 0.05%–0.30%. Over 20–25 years, this difference in fees compounds into a significant wealth gap — often lakhs of rupees.
div>There is growing academic debate on this. As passive funds automatically buy index stocks regardless of valuation, it can theoretically inflate prices of index heavyweights. However, in India, passive AUM is still a small fraction of total mutual fund AUM, so this risk is limited for now — though worth monitoring as passive adoption grows.
For most beginners, starting with a simple portfolio of a Nifty 50 index fund and a Nifty Next 50 index fund is the most reliable, low-cost, low-maintenance approach. Once you understand investing better, you can gradually add selective active fund exposure in mid and small caps.
Closet indexing is when an “active” fund’s portfolio is so similar to the benchmark index that it generates near-index returns but charges active fund fees. Signs include: very high overlap with Nifty 50 stocks, low Active Share score, and returns tracking the index closely over 3–5 years while charging 0.8%+ TER. Use portfolio analysis tools on Value Research or Morningstar India to check overlap.
div>Almost never, unless you have a genuine financial emergency. Stopping SIPs during a crash means you buy fewer units when prices are low — the exact opposite of good investing behavior. Rupee cost averaging makes crashes work in your favor if you stay invested.
💡 Found this guide valuable? Share it with a friend who’s confused about active vs. passive investing. One conversation could save them lakhs in wrong fund choices.
Share on WhatsApp
blogger for past 15 years onprasadgovenkar.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/prasadgovenkar/
https://www.facebook.com/prasad.govenkar